Disconnecting the network before entering the game unexpectedly bypasses the "Secure Boot" check![]()
Disconnecting the network before entering the game unexpectedly bypasses the "Secure Boot" check![]()
It's a beta, so I wouldn't be too excited about how things turn out.
I remember when leaks about Ricochet came out and how laughable it seemed with COD at its early stages.
Now it does a decent job. Rage cheaters don't last long, closet cheaters still get caught, even if later than sooner, and new machine learning methods are becoming advanced for their time.
So even if it looks like a joke now, I wouldn't dismiss it right away.
EA seems interested in trying to stop cheating, but we all know if there is a will, there is a way.
This cat and mouse game won't stop until someone gives up, and it doesn't look like anyone plans to.
Even though their in-house EAAC was leaked with detection strings, I recall the same thing happening with early Ricochet in COD.
Only time will tell how it goes. EA will either put a lot into their in-house anti-cheat or not.
It's still cheaper for them than using a third-party anti-cheat.
https://www.pcgamer.com/games/fps/ba...rough-the-net/
- - - Updated - - -
I'm curious to see if we can get this done safely once it's released... in the meantime, I'd be happy with an esp (visible only)...![]()
im sure the anti cheat can see if your chinese motherboard actually doesnt support secure boot and just skips the check for you, what motherboard do you have? not like secureboot is a problem anyway, SC supports loading their driver with secure boot in pretty sure, secure boot means little to nothing
Monty (08-10-2025)
you can also use lagofast to bypass secureboot requirement
So we probably wont see a BF6 cheat then?
Is Javelin some advanced form of BattleEye/Fairfight?
No, Javelin isn’t an advanced form of BattleEye or FairFight. It’s EA’s own kernel-level anti-cheat built from scratch, though it works in a similar way to BattleEye rather than FairFight.